|
We put expiration on the schedule for a couple months from
now.
In general, I don't like expiration, and prefer organization
of preserved responses. Usually, either responses are in the
wrong place (and should be moved),
or shouldn't have been created in the first place (and should
be deleted),
or a large tree needs to be subdivided into several smaller trees
to be more easily browsed by readers.
1.9B5.6 supports reorganizing a bit better with bulk move
and deletion. But despite all this, it is still sometimes
appropriate to expire old postings, or at least automatically
archive them.
| 
No expiration yet - reorganization instead 
means of "expiring" responses?
(Christopher Kolar)
