Next-in-Thread Next-in-Thread
 Next Message Next Message

SDI Suppoorts RegisterViewer 

Forum: CCI for Perl
Re: Why don't do is as in Netscape 1.1??? (Roman MItnitski)
Re: Coz Unix/Netscape remote control is horrible... but SDI... (Adrian Howard)
Date: 1995, Feb 26
From: Linas Vepstas

One nice thing that SDI supports that CCI doesn't appears to be the "RegisterViewer" verb. Why is this nice?

It allows the web browser to use non-inline viewers or to "punt" on new/unsupported/archaic mime types -- for example postscript, mpeg or vrml. Currently, all browsers support external viewers, but the usability is painful -- e.g. viewing a postscript document, an external viewer is spawned, you position/resize the window, view the doc, and then kill the viewer. A second postscript document requires re-spawning, repostioning, etc. Wouldn't it be nice if a postscript window, once launched, always stays up, and just shows the new doc?

Maybe postscript is a bad example. Maybe mpeg, vrml, or oogl make better examples -- It is not at all clear that you'd necessarily want to inline vrml or oogl. In fact, for a DOOM-like 3D -cruise through hallways, click on things, you very well would want the 3D to go in a separate window, in which you cruise, while any click on an ordinary html href in the 3D window would be handled by the web browser. And any click on a vrml in the ordianry web browser would be handled by the 3D window.

Furthermore, RegisterViewer provides a modicum of code stability for the browser developer -- you don't have to worry about breaking code that works when trying to suport a new mime-type. Whatever. --linas

 Next-in-Thread Next-in-Thread
 Next Message Next Message
Inline:
 1 1
 All All
Outline:
 1 1
 2 2
 All All

1 RegisterViewer vs. SEND OUTPUT by Linas Vepstas, 1995, Feb 26

 Add Add
to: "SDI Suppoorts RegisterViewer"

 Members Members
 Subscribe Subscribe
 Admin Mode Admin Mode
 Show Frames Show Frames
 Help Help


Earn money with Scour!
Google
 
Web www.HyperNews.org
Earn money with Scour!